the soft compulsion of constant consumption training

44 notes &

Plato distinguished between opinion or common belief (doxa) and certain knowledge, and that’s still a workable distinction today: unlike ‘1+1=2’ or ‘there are no square circles,’ an opinion has a degree of subjectivity and uncertainty to it. But “opinion” ranges from tastes or preferences, through views about questions that concern most people such as prudence or politics, to views grounded in technical expertise, such as legal or scientific opinions.

You can’t really argue about the first kind of opinion. I’d be silly to insist that you’re wrong to think strawberry ice cream is better than chocolate. The problem is that sometimes we implicitly seem to take opinions of the second and even the third sort to be unarguable in the way questions of taste are. Perhaps that’s one reason (no doubt there are others) why enthusiastic amateurs think they’re entitled to disagree with climate scientists and immunologists and have their views ‘respected.’

No, You’re Not Entitled to Your Opinion.”
  1. nickminichino reblogged this from imathers
  2. imathers reblogged this from marathonpacks
  3. mconor reblogged this from marathonpacks
  4. ihavenothingtosayandimsayingit reblogged this from marathonpacks
  5. moodyalien reblogged this from audiokayness and added:
    I couldn’t agree more with audiokayness (and disagree more with the last sentence of the original post). the thought...
  6. audiokayness reblogged this from caelifax
  7. ethanstanislawski reblogged this from marathonpacks
  8. angelic-hipster-mermaid-slut69 reblogged this from stanielsbookclub
  9. getradified reblogged this from towerofsleep
  10. towerofsleep reblogged this from marathonpacks
  11. stanielsbookclub reblogged this from lukesimcoe
  12. caelifax reblogged this from marathonpacks
  13. lukesimcoe reblogged this from marathonpacks
  14. marathonpacks posted this